Article View/Open
Publication Export
Related Publications in TAIR
- > Simple Record
- > Full Record
| Field |
Value |
| Title: | KPIs in Taiwan basic education. |
| Authors: | 陳榮政
Wu, Ching Shan
Chen, Robin Jung-Cheng |
| Contributors: | 教育學院 |
| Date: | 2014-08 |
| Issue Date: | 2017-09-04 17:18:51 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | The study adopted Fuzzy Delphi method to set up KPIs (key performance indicators) in Taiwan basic education by collecting 12 expert scholars opinions on a questionnaire developed from various literature review. Among the 37 indicators constructed in this study, the top five perceived by the experts as most important had Gi values > 8.75. From the highest to the lowest, these indicators were “Learning achievement performance: Student learning performance in various learning domains”, “Parental satisfaction: Parent satisfaction toward school”, “Physical fitness performance: Degree of student performance beyond standard criteria for physical fitness tests”, “3-3-2 School reputation: Degree of high regard of community (society) for the school”, and “School culture: Degree of warmth and care exhibited by school personnel”. |
| Relation: | Journal of Modern Education Review, Vol.4, No.8, pp.565–578 |
| Data Type: | article |
| DOI: | http://dx.doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/08.04.2014/001 |
| DCField |
Value |
Language |
| dc.contributor (Contributor) | 教育學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (Authors) | 陳榮政 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (Authors) | Wu, Ching Shan | en_US |
| dc.creator (Authors) | Chen, Robin Jung-Cheng | en_US |
| dc.date (Date) | 2014-08 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-04 17:18:51 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-09-04 17:18:51 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (Issue Date) | 2017-09-04 17:18:51 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112515 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (Abstract) | The study adopted Fuzzy Delphi method to set up KPIs (key performance indicators) in Taiwan basic education by collecting 12 expert scholars opinions on a questionnaire developed from various literature review. Among the 37 indicators constructed in this study, the top five perceived by the experts as most important had Gi values > 8.75. From the highest to the lowest, these indicators were “Learning achievement performance: Student learning performance in various learning domains”, “Parental satisfaction: Parent satisfaction toward school”, “Physical fitness performance: Degree of student performance beyond standard criteria for physical fitness tests”, “3-3-2 School reputation: Degree of high regard of community (society) for the school”, and “School culture: Degree of warmth and care exhibited by school personnel”. | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 205290 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (Relation) | Journal of Modern Education Review, Vol.4, No.8, pp.565–578 | en_US |
| dc.title (Title) | KPIs in Taiwan basic education. | zh_TW |
| dc.type (Data Type) | article | |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/08.04.2014/001 | |
| dc.doi.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/08.04.2014/001 | |
(257)